Wednesday 28 November 2012

What can we learn from the Zee episode?


[OPINION]

Whether the sting was operated by the editors of Zee News or Naveen Jindal, congress MP and steel tycoon, the legal system will tell – maybe after years. But what can the media learn from this episode?                           

Prima facie, both Jindal and the Zee News editors appear to be at fault. As per unconfirmed media reports, Jindal offered Rs 20 crore to the Zee editors and the editors in turn demanded Rs 100 crore. From a journalistic standpoint, the editors’ demanding any amount money from any business in return for any favour is unacceptable and is against the basic ethics of the profession.                            

"Assuming" this to be true for a moment, the next question is what made the editors cross their limits? Is it because they are the proprietors of the business? Perhaps yes. Ideally, editors should not be the proprietors of the media house they are working for. If they wear the dual hat, they will be tempted to employ such tricks to meet their revenue targets. There are however, excellent examples globally, where the editor is the owner of the media house and yet it is run ethically.

Many proprietors also try to push their editors/ journalists to favour a particular company assuming it would get them that extra buck. Sorry guys, that model didn’t work yesterday and it will not work today. The best-run publications or media houses give complete editorial freedom and there is a thick line between the editorial and the business. This line cannot blur until you are blind or pretend to be so.         

So, how can the media ensure ethical journalism? Empowerment and self-regulation would perhaps solve most of the issues. Senior editors need to be empowered such that they are part of the company’s board – not responsible for bringing in revenues but responsible for ensuring good journalism. This would not allow business heads to arm twist the editors to play the sales game. The second solution lies in self regulation wherein an independent panel of retired journalists and senior editors (who have no interest/stake in any of the media houses) would have the full authority to “fire” any employee of any media house who is found indulging in unethical activities.                    

Shekhar Gupta, Editor-in-Chief of the Indian Express said in a recent debate in CNN-IBN that journalists today are more ethical and professional than ever before. I agree with him on this. I am in the industry and I know it for sure that by and large, today’s modern-day journalists are ethical, smart and more professional. It is perhaps because most of them have attended journalism schools and they survive in a competitive environment where talent shines.

On that note, let us commit ourselves to creating a system where journalism is sacrosanct. Let me take you back and remind you once again of my favourite tagline and the gospel truth that good journalism is good business!  

(The purpose of this write-up is not to judge who's right or wrong, but only to turn the gaze inwards into the profession of journalism, in general)